<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frames Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html</link>
	<description>All the latest inline aggressive roller news</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dabladeguru</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-84508</link>
		<dc:creator>Dabladeguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 11:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-84508</guid>
		<description>hmmm not bad all, i like, the groove is similar to other frames but more could be done, if your going to design a frame the mst important thing is to be different from the rest add least one more thing can be done on that and it ll be perfecto. not saying it is a shit frame though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm not bad all, i like, the groove is similar to other frames but more could be done, if your going to design a frame the mst important thing is to be different from the rest add least one more thing can be done on that and it ll be perfecto. not saying it is a shit frame though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: word</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83155</link>
		<dc:creator>word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83155</guid>
		<description>freestyle all the way. cbf replacing and servicing antis. i quite like the design tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freestyle all the way. cbf replacing and servicing antis. i quite like the design tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LT</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83144</link>
		<dc:creator>LT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83144</guid>
		<description>Wow, i like these frames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, i like these frames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobF</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83124</link>
		<dc:creator>RobF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83124</guid>
		<description>last I checked frames were good and UFS was implemented for a reason.  these look nice, wide space, with 4 down ability.  what I like to see anyway. 

kids won't be happy till there are fucking magnets in frames.  death to freestyle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last I checked frames were good and UFS was implemented for a reason.  these look nice, wide space, with 4 down ability.  what I like to see anyway. </p>
<p>kids won&#8217;t be happy till there are fucking magnets in frames.  death to freestyle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB$</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83112</link>
		<dc:creator>CB$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83112</guid>
		<description>its seems like frame design has hit a slump, not saying that this design is bad, but it seems like creativity vs functionality is stopping us from expanding.... I mean UFS.... then freestyle frames........has the evolution ended?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its seems like frame design has hit a slump, not saying that this design is bad, but it seems like creativity vs functionality is stopping us from expanding&#8230;. I mean UFS&#8230;. then freestyle frames&#8230;&#8230;..has the evolution ended?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truce '07 --oner--&#62;</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83088</link>
		<dc:creator>Truce '07 --oner--&#62;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83088</guid>
		<description>look like able freestyles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look like able freestyles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOEJOE</title>
		<link>http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83083</link>
		<dc:creator>JOEJOE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rollernews.com/frames-concepts_2998.html#comment-83083</guid>
		<description>able?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>able?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
